Understanding the Four Mind Axes
These four mind axes pertain to how we process information. They are Associativity (Directivity) and Convergence (Convergence), and Lexicality. Each of these categories is essential to the mind and knowing how they function is essential to understand human cognition. The mind’s axes may not be the same for all.
Associativity
Associativity of the mind is a measure of how people think. People with high Associativity tend think in streams of consciousness rather than focusing on a particular subject or idea for extended periods of time. They also tend to change topics frequently, often generating a lot of connections. Contrary to other typesof people, it’s not necessary to indicate disorganization or Socionics lack of focus. The most significant characteristic of Associativity is its ability to think in multiple ways. People with high Associativity tend to be more than able to think on their feet naturally, which is a common trait.
While the method is based on compass however, it also focuses on the internal cognitive functions of the two involved axes. It is designed to educate people about the concept of cognition and the role they play in creating communication patterns. It is similar in concept to Trixie’s Neurotypology but it focuses more on internal processes rather than the external profile.
Directivity
Mind Axes are a way to assess various aspects of the human mind. It is possible to measure divergence and directivity in different aspects of our thinking. Divergent thinking is the ability to generate multiple ideas from the same input and form free associations. This is in contrast to Directivity and Mind Axes Convergence where we are seeking the most effective solution from a huge amount of data.
Convergence
Convergence of mind axes a cognitive process where we utilize our two primary axes of our thinking. This axis is in a positive relationship to the Analytical Axis and is wired for Global Thinking. It is also closely linked to System 2, which is the process of the process of analyzing and evaluating information an organized manner.
Lexicality
A system that is focused on cognition is important because it incorporates Lexicality. Mind Axes’ systems make clear distinctions between kinds that are based on cognitive content. They don’t rely on static types or traits. They operate as a compass, which describes how an individual perceives the world and people around them.
To determine the degree of lexicality contrast we utilized two kinds of words. One was a word with high frequency, while the other was one with a low frequency. High-frequency words were contrasted with words of lower frequency and the two types were compared by lexicality contrast. The interaction between frequency contrast and lexicality contrast was then examined. We also compared lexicality contrast with a fixation baseline.
The results indicated that imageability is affected by lexicality. High-frequency words are activated more than low-frequency words and they have higher activation than nonwords. This is in line with previous research. The lexicality effect has also been observed in the left inferior cerebellar, right cerebellar, and left fusiform regions.
Lexicality influences representations of words like orthography, semantics, and phonology. These effects are also crucial for processes that don’t rely on the existing Lexical representations.
Impressionism
Impressionism was a late 19th century art movement that sought to capture the fleeting quality of light and color , and to study the new psychological concepts concerning consciousness. The most famous works of Impressionism are the works of Renoir, Monet, Socionics Test Renoir, Cezanne, and Manet. It is a visual representation of the Modernist departure from Locke’s empirical theory of knowledge.
Seurat’s works are among the most well-known works of this style. However, Neo-Impressionism moved beyond this and evolved into pointillism. Paul Signac, Henri Edmond Cross and others are notable examples from this period. Both of them studied at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts where George Seuret also was a student.
Laterality
Laterality of mind is the ability to see the indirect effects of phenomena. It is a key part of human motor Personality dexterity and actions. But how can a person think laterally? There are a variety of factors that contribute to this ability. One of these is the thumb-palm complex.
Laterality of mind refers to the individual differences in the way the brain’s hemispheres process information. Certain of the differences are more prominent for those who are left-handed in comparison to those who are right-handed. For instance, people who are left-handed are more likely to use their right hemisphere for language, whereas those who are right-handed are more likely to use their right hemisphere for spatial and visual processing. However, lateralization can also be dependent on universal principles that govern behavior.
Cortical activity in both the left and right hemispheres are predominant when the laterality the mind axis is determined. Even when auditory and visual signals were combined, this lateralization effect was evident. It was also evident regardless of the response given to an event.
