Understanding the Four Mind Axes
The four mind axes are connected to the way that we process information. They are: Associativity (Directivity) and Convergence (Convergence), and Lexicality. Each is a crucial part of the mind and understanding how they operate is crucial to understand human cognition. But, the mind’s is not the same for all.
Associativity
The way people think is called Associativity of Mind. People with high Associativity tend not to be able to focus on a single topic or idea for prolonged periods of time instead, they are able to think in multiple streams of consciousness. They are also susceptible to a variety of topics, making many connections. In contrast to other types of thinking, however, Associativity is not always a sign of confusion and lack of focus. One of the most important characteristics of Associativity is its capacity to think in various ways. People who have high Associativity are better adept at brainstorming, which is a natural trait.
The method is based on compass but also is focused on internal cognitions of both axes. It’s aim is to inform people about cognition and the role it plays in the creation of communication patterns. It is similar to Trixie’s Neurotypology but differs in the way that it focuses on the internal brain processes rather than the external profiles of the mind.
Directivity
Mind axes can be used to measure different aspects of the human mind. It is possible to measure divergence and directivity in various aspects of our thinking. Divergent thinking is the capacity to create multiple ideas out of one input and form free associations. It is the opposite of Directivity and Convergence, in which we aim to create the most efficient solution from an unstructured data set.
Convergence
Convergence between mind axes is a reference to a mental process in which we use our primary thinking axes. This axis is strongly connected to the Analytical Axis and is wired for Global Thinking. It is also tightly linked to System 2, which is the process of studying and evaluating information in structured ways.
Lexicality
Lexicality is a crucial aspect of a system that focuses on cognition. Mind Axes‘ systems make clear distinctions between types based on cognitive content and don’t rely on static patterns or socionics Test typologies. They are as a compass, which describes how an individual regards the world and people around them.
To socionics test lexicality contrast, we utilized two kinds of words. One was a high-frequency word, while the other was a lower-frequency word. The high-frequency words were contrasted to the words with low frequency and the two types were evaluated using lexicality comparison. The interaction between word frequency contrast and lexicality contrast was then tested. We also compared lexicality with the fixation baseline.
The results revealed that imageability is affected by lexicality. The activation of words with high frequency is greater than that of low-frequency words and they are more activated than nonwords. This is in line with previous research. The lexicality effect was also evident in the left inferior Mind Axes frontal cerebellar region, right cerebellar and left fusiform regions.
Lexicality affects representations that are specific to words, such as orthography, phonology, and semantics. These effects are equally important in processes that do not rely on preexisting representations of lexical meanings.
Impressionism
Impressionism was a late 19th-century art movement that was attempting to capture the fleeting qualities of light and color, as well as to explore new psychological concepts about consciousness. The most famous works of Impressionism are the works of Renoir, Monet, Renoir, Cezanne, and Manet. It offers a visual representation of the Modernist break from Locke’s empirical theory of knowledge.
Seurat’s paintings are often regarded as the most popular works of this style, Neo-Impressionism went beyond this and into pointillism. A few notable artists of this period are Paul Signac and Henri Edmond Cross. Both of them were educated at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts, where George Seuret studied.
Laterality
The ability to see the future is the ability to see the indirect effects of phenomena. It is an essential part of human motor dexterity as well as movement. But how does a person think laterally There are many factors which contribute to this capability. One factor that contributes to this ability is the thumb-palm complicated.
The laterality of mind can be a reflection of differences in the individual’s way one hemisphere processes information. Certain of these differences are more apparent for people who are left-handed in comparison to those who are right-handed. For example, people who are left-handed are more likely to utilize their right hemisphere for language, whereas those who are right-handed are more likely use their right hemisphere for visual and spatial processing. However, lateralization is affected by universal rules that govern behavior.
When the laterality of the mind axis is determined cortical activity is observed in the right and left hemispheres is the most active. The lateralization effect was evident even when visual and auditory cues were substituted for each other. It was evident regardless of the response to the stimulus.
