Understanding the Four Mind Axes
These four mind axes connect to the way we process information. These are Associativity, Directivity Convergence, Lexicality, and Mind Axes Associativity. Each of them is essential to the mind and knowing how they function is crucial to understand human cognition. The mind’s axes could not be the same for all.
Associativity
The measurement of how people think is called Associativity of Mind. People who are highly Associative tend to think in streams of consciousness rather than focusing solely on a particular subject or idea for extended periods of time. They are also more prone to a variety of topics, making numerous connections. Contrary to other types, however, enneagram test associativity doesn’t always mean unfocusedness or disorganization. The most important characteristic is the range of thought. People with high Associativity are capable of brainstorming, attitudinal Psyche which is a natural characteristic.
While the method is based on compass but it also focuses on the internal thinking processes of the two axes involved. It aims to teach people about cognition and the role it plays in creating communication patterns. It is similar in principle to Trixie’s Neurotypology but it focuses more on internal processes rather than the external aspects.
Directivity
Utilizing mind axes to assess different aspects of the human mind It is possible to gauge the degree of directivity and divergence various aspects of our thinking. Divergent thinking is the capacity to create multiple ideas out of one input and form free associations. This is in contrast to Directivity and Convergence where we seek the best solution from a vast amount of data.
Convergence
Convergence of mind axes is the cognitive process that requires us to make use of our two primary axes of thought. This axis is closely related to the Analytical Axis and is wired to facilitate Global Thinking. It is also connected to System 2, which is the process for analysing and evaluating information in a structured manner.
Lexicality
Lexicality is a crucial aspect of a system focusing on cognition. Mind Axes’ systems make clear distinctions between different types based on cognitive content and don’t rely on static typologies or mbti test traits. They work as a compass, which is the way an individual views the world and the people around them.
Two types of words were tested to determine the contrast in lexicality. One was a high-frequency word while the other was a low-frequency word. High-frequency words were contrasted with words of lower frequency and the two types were compared by lexicality contrast. The relationship between word frequency contrast and lexicality contrast was then assessed. We also compared lexicality with a fixation baseline.
The results showed that imageability is influenced by lexicality. High-frequency words are more active than words with lower frequency, and they show greater activation than words that are not. This is in agreement with previous research. The lexicality effect has also been observed in the left inferior cerebellar, PDX right cerebellar and left fusiform areas.
Lexicality affects representations that are specific to words such as orthography phonology, and semantics. These effects are also crucial when dealing with processes that don’t depend on existing words or lexical representations.
Impressionism
Impressionism was a late 19th century art movement that attempted to capture the fleeting effects of light and color, Big Five as well as to explore new psychological concepts about consciousness. The most well-known examples of Impressionism are the works of Renoir, Monet, Renoir, Cezanne, and Pdx (pdx.gg) Manet. It offers a visual representation of the Modernist departure from Locke’s empirical theory of knowledge.
Seurat’s paintings are the most well-known paintings in this style. However, Neo-Impressionism moved beyond this and evolved into pointillism. Some notable artists of this period include Paul Signac and Henri Edmond Cross. Both of these artists were educated at Ecole des Beaux-Arts where George Seuret also studied.
Laterality
The ability to see the future is the ability to discern the indirect consequences of phenomena. It is an essential part of motor dexterity as well as movement. But how can a person think laterally? There are several factors that contribute to this ability. One of these is the thumb-palm complex.
Laterality of mind refers to the individual different ways in which the brain’s hemispheres process information. These differences are more apparent in left-handed people than in right-handed people. People who are left-handed tend to use their left side for language, whereas people who are right-handed use their right side for spatial and visual processing. However, lateralization is also dependent on universal principles which govern our behavior.
When the laterality of mind axis is assessed cortical activity in both the right and left hemispheres is the most active. Even when auditory and visual cues were combined the lateralization effect was evident. It was evident regardless of type of stimulus.
